This one deserves a rating with more flexibility. For concept I give it 4 of 5, for execution a 3 (and in parts a 2), and for the interview at the end, a 5.
It does an admirable job of pursuing the idea that an emergent intelligence may not operate by the same rules humans do. I'll likely add the next one to my list. I'd recommend it to anyone interested in AI or identity, but wouldn't recommend it universally.